Guillermo Canas vs Michal Przysiezny Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W L W L
Form
L L L L W L L L L LHead To Head: Canas 1 - 0 Przysiezny
They have played 2 sets in total, with Canas winning 2 and Przysiezny winning 0. The last match between Canas and Przysiezny was at the Catella Swedish Open - Bastad, 12-07-2009, Q2 round, Clay with Guillermo Canas getting the victory 7-6(9) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | 1 |
| Michal Przysiezny | 0 |
Catella Swedish Open - Bastad(12-07-2009)
7
6
6
3
| Canas | Stats | Przysiezny |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 8 | Highest Rank | 57 |
| 47 | Age | 41 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 16 |
| 61% (374-239) | Career Total W/L | 56% (465-368) |
| $1,348,320 | Career Prize Money | $403,630 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Canas VS Przysiezny H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(9) 6-3 |
Stats 
Guillermo Canas
Player
Michal Przysiezny
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Canas VS Przysiezny H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 51% (40/78) | 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) |
| 70% (28/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (24/42) |
| 61% (23/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (14/24) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 42% (28/66) | Return Points Win % | 35% (27/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Guillermo Canas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Guillermo Canas
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guillermo Canas
Player
Teodor-Dacian Craciun
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andreas Vinciguerra
Player
Guillermo Canas
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
97)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillermo Canas
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
40%
(
22 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guillermo Canas
Player
Tim Goransson
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Guillermo Canas
Player
Michal Przysiezny
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Albert Montanes
Player
Guillermo Canas
57%
(
76 of
133)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
53%
(
30 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
37%
(
49 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
125
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillermo Canas
Player
Diego Junqueira
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
84
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paolo Lorenzi
Player
Guillermo Canas
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (374/239) | Win/Loss | 56% (465/368) |
| 58% (897/639) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1079/907) |
| 53% (7804/6808) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (10032/9367) |
| 60% (103/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (92/93) |
| 64% (207/115) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (140/128) |
| 51% (38/37) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (208/127) |
| 59% (26/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (25/20) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 872 | Aces Total | 3053 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 408 | Total Double Faults | 1304 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 23.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 578.77 |
| 56% (6740/12033) | 1st Serve % | 60% (17992/29764) |
| 73% (4888/6740) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (13300/17992) |
| 51% (2712/5292) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5981/11772) |
| 45% (521/1164) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (857/2180) |
| 40% (4916/12386) | Return Points Win % | 35% (9721/28096) |
| 58% (44/32) | Slam W/L | 52% (26/24) |
| 57% (60/46) | Masters W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 71% (5/2) | Cups W/L | 38% (10/16) |
| 58% (173/124) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (66/87) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (91/34) | Challenger W/L | 58% (253/185) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 68% (104/48) |
| 62% (324/522) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (448/774) |
| 52% (44/84) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 31% (13/42) |
| 51% (108/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (199/377) |
| 53% (100/188) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (154/278) |
| 86% (359/308) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (442/370) |
| 14% (359/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (442/70) |
| 26% (254/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (391/95) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
